What is the context?
The next case concerns the congregation violating a command without recognizing it. When the sin becomes known, the assembly brings a bull and its elders place their hands on its head as representatives of the people.
The blood procedure resembles the priest’s offering, including its use inside the Tent of Meeting and the burning outside the camp. This paragraph explicitly promises forgiveness through the atonement the priest makes. Shared wrongdoing is faced together rather than hidden behind the absence of an initial intention to sin.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley understands the whole congregation as the body or greater part of the people, with their rulers involved. The USCCB note relates this case closely to the preceding priestly case. The written instructions distinguish the assembly’s offering while leaving the precise circumstances of a particular collective error unspecified.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.