What is the context?
The opening offerings are followed by instructions concerning unintentional violations of the Lord’s commands. The first case is the anointed priest whose sin brings guilt on the people. His office does not place him beyond the need to answer for wrongdoing.
The blood is taken into the Tent of Meeting, sprinkled before the veil, and applied to the incense altar. The remaining blood goes to the base of the outer altar. After the fat is burned, the rest of the bull is burned outside the camp in a ceremonially clean place.
How is this passage commonly understood?
The BSB calls this a sin offering. The USCCB notes use purification offering to emphasize the cleansing of the sanctuary where the blood is applied. Brown–Driver–Briggs records both sin and sin-offering uses for חַטָּאת, chattat (khat-TAHT). The offering concerns real wrongdoing and its effects on the holy place; the two emphases should not be treated as unrelated rites.
Wesley draws attention to the priest’s own imperfection and the wider consequences of his sin. The special blood procedure distinguishes this case from the later offerings for a leader or an ordinary Israelite.
Where does this fit in God's plan?
Hebrews 13:10–16 explicitly connects sin offerings burned outside the camp with Jesus suffering outside the city gate. It then calls believers to identify with Him and bear His disgrace. This is a New Testament connection to the sacrificial pattern, not an invented meaning for every part of the bull.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.