What is the context?
A delegation associated with Bethel asks whether the mourning fast should continue. The question reaches priests and prophets in the restored setting.
The Lord responds by asking whether the fasting was really for Him. Eating and drinking can be equally self-directed.
The issue is therefore larger than preserving or ending a practice. The community must consider the purpose of its worship and its response to the word already given.
The prosperous former Jerusalem is recalled as a time when earlier prophets were already calling for attentive obedience. Religious observance cannot replace hearing them.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley takes the envoys as coming from the Babylonian community, whereas the BSB explicitly names Bethel as the sender. Both the question and the Lord’s reply concern whether established mourning has become detached from devotion to Him.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.