What is the context?

The nations that fought Jerusalem meet plague, panic, and defeat. The disturbing bodily imagery portrays the collapse of hostile power.

The vision does not end with every foreigner destroyed. Survivors from those same nations go up to worship the Lord and celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles.

Withheld rain and further plague show the seriousness of refusing the King’s worship. Egypt is expressly included rather than exempted.

The movement is from hostility to worship under the Lord’s rule. It is not a medical identification of a future disease or a present command to force a pilgrimage on another population.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley takes the feast as a figure for the worship of converted Gentiles. The Cambridge commentary describes the survivors’ yearly worship in Jerusalem and also connects the festival with the gathering of nations into God’s people. The degree to which the festival picture specifies future practice remains an interpretive question.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.