What is the context?
The speaker asks that enemies not be killed in a way the people quickly forget, then asks for their consuming judgment. The desired outcome includes a public knowledge of God’s rule.
The prowling dogs return, but the speaker’s anticipated morning is filled with song to the God of loving devotion. The contrast is between restless pursuit and a refuge that can sustain praise.
The severe requests are appeals within an endangered person’s prayer. They do not supply a general program for prolonging or inflicting someone’s suffering.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley reads the scattering as a visible reminder of justice and the ending as trusting praise. The differing requests should be heard together rather than hiding one to make the prayer appear simpler or less severe than it is.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.