What is the context?
The final case concerns vows made in the husband’s household, including pledges of self-denial. He may confirm or nullify them when he hears; silence confirms the vows and makes them stand.
If he subsequently nullifies what he has heard, he bears her iniquity. His authority is therefore tied to responsibility and a stated time for response. The closing sentence identifies these as statutes concerning husband and wife and a father and young daughter in his home.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley understands the final warning as a husband hindering a vow he had already approved by silence, making him responsible for its nonperformance. This explains why silence matters throughout the chapter. It does not make household authority an unrestricted right to reverse obligations whenever convenient.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.