What is the context?
The wall’s gaps have been closed, although the gate doors have not yet been installed. Sanballat and Geshem repeatedly invite Nehemiah to a meeting outside Jerusalem. Nehemiah recognizes an intention to harm him and refuses to leave the work.
After four invitations receive the same answer, Sanballat sends an unsealed letter. It alleges that Nehemiah intends to rebel, become king and have prophets proclaim him. Nehemiah denies the allegations as inventions. The account presents the letter as an attempt to frighten the workers into giving up.
Nehemiah answers briefly and turns to God for strength to continue. The passage moves from an invitation that would remove him from the work to an accusation designed to make staying at it appear dangerous.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Henry and Gill understand the invitations and letter as connected efforts to stop the rebuilding. Gill sees the unsealed letter as a way to spread the allegation more widely. Both emphasize Nehemiah’s steady attention to the task and his reliance on God.
The account gives specific reasons for recognizing this plot: the intention to harm him and the accusations he identifies as fabricated. It does not treat every question or criticism of a leader as the same kind of threat.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.