What is the context?
Nehemiah becomes angry at the complaints, gives the matter serious thought and rebukes the nobles and officials for charging their own brothers interest. He contrasts their conduct with the effort to buy back Jews who had been sold to foreigners.
He says that he and his household are also lending money and grain, and calls on them to stop charging interest. He requires the immediate return of fields, vineyards, olive groves, houses and the amounts being assessed.
The creditors agree to restore what has been taken and require nothing more. Nehemiah brings in the priests to confirm the promise by oath, then shakes out his robe as a warning of what should happen to anyone who breaks it. The assembly praises God, and the people act on the promise.
The prohibition of interest on a loan to a brother appears in Deuteronomy 23:19–20. Deuteronomy 15:1–18 also joins debt release and care for servants with the memory that Israel was once enslaved and redeemed.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Henry emphasizes that fear of God should change how people use their rights and resources toward their neighbors. Gill likewise understands the response as the return of property confirmed by an oath. The account’s emphasis is on returning what has been taken and following through, rather than ending with words alone.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.