What is the context?
The priests are warned to take the Lord’s honor to heart. The curse and humiliating waste imagery expose the seriousness of their misuse of sacred office.
The remembered covenant with Levi is characterized by life, peace, reverence, truthful instruction, and walking uprightly with God.
A priest should preserve knowledge and turn people from iniquity. The actual priests have instead caused stumbling by their instruction and shown partiality.
The contrast measures leadership by fidelity and its effect on others. Holding office does not place a teacher beyond correction, and the judgment imagery gives hearers no authority to humiliate or attack a minister.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley connects the true instruction with faithful priestly service and the corruption with false exposition and favoritism. His criticism concerns what teachers do with the law rather than a blanket accusation against every person holding a religious office.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.