What is the context?
The final case concerns a countryman who sells himself to a prosperous resident foreigner or that person’s family. A brother or other close relative may redeem him, or he may redeem himself if he gains the means.
The payment is calculated according to the remaining years, and harsh rule must not be allowed. Even without an earlier redemption, he and his children go free at Jubilee. The conclusion repeats the reason: Israelites belong to the Lord who brought them from Egypt.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley stresses the community’s responsibility to prevent harsh treatment rather than simply observing it. The USCCB notes place the case among the laws responding to poverty. The purchaser’s foreign origin does not remove the Israelite’s stated right of recovery and release.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.