What is the context?

Aaron first brings the bull’s blood and the protective cloud of incense behind the veil. The goat’s blood then concerns the people. The stated reason for cleansing the Most Holy Place is Israel’s impurities, rebellious acts, and sins.

The Tent of Meeting and altar are also cleansed. God’s dwelling remains among a people whose uncleanness affects their worship; the sacred place is not treated as detached from the people’s life. No one else is to be in the Tent of Meeting during Aaron’s work of atonement.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley emphasizes that the people’s sins affect the sanctuary even though they do not personally enter its innermost room. The USCCB notes similarly emphasize purification of sacred places. They differ over the altar in verses 18–19: Wesley identifies the incense altar, while the USCCB notes identify the open-air altar. The BSB’s wording remains the altar before the Lord.

Where does this fit in God's plan?

Hebrews 9:6–14, 23–28 explicitly compares the high priest’s repeated entry with Christ entering the heavenly presence by His own blood. It carries the discussion from cleansing sacred things and bodies to cleansing conscience and securing redemption. The comparison rests on the New Testament’s explanation, not a guessed meaning for every count of sprinklings.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?