What is the context?
Men who know of their wives’ offerings and the assembled women answer together that they will not listen. The refusal is explicit rather than merely implied by ignorance.
They defend vows to the Queen of Heaven by appealing to ancestral and royal practice and to remembered abundance. They interpret later hunger and war as the result of stopping those offerings.
The women also say their husbands knew about the cakes and drink offerings. The account therefore includes shared household responsibility rather than assigning the whole practice to secretly disobedient wives.
The central dispute is how to interpret prosperity and disaster. The next reply will challenge the causal story by which they defend their worship.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley suggests some husbands may not have known what was happening. The BSB’s speakers instead emphasize their husbands’ knowledge, so that explanatory guess should not override the argument actually made in their speech.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.