What is the context?

The remnant asks Jeremiah to pray for direction and vows to obey whether the answer is pleasant or unpleasant. Jeremiah promises to report the whole reply.

After ten days, the Lord tells them to stay in the land and not fear Babylon’s king. Building, planting, deliverance, and compassion are promised for that course.

Going to Egypt because it appears free of war and hunger will bring the very sword and famine they fear. The warning concerns this named remnant and this revealed choice.

Jeremiah ends by exposing the self-deception in asking for a word they will not obey. The next chapter narrates their refusal rather than leaving the promise of obedience untested.

The passage therefore challenges predetermined answers disguised as openness. Its ten-day wait is part of this account, not a timetable for every request for guidance.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley explains pleasant or unpleasant as agreeable or disagreeable to the hearers, and the Lord’s relenting as a changed course of providence toward the remainder. The text does not ask the people to obey a morally evil instruction.

Where does this fit in God's plan?

James 1:18–27 joins new birth through the word of truth with receiving that word and doing it rather than deceiving oneself by hearing alone. This wider Christian theme gives a constructive response to the remnant’s failed promise. James does not quote this consultation or command every threatened person to stay in place.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.