Jeremiah 36:27-32

Why can the king destroy the scroll without ending the word?

Berean Standard Bible

27 After the king had burned the scroll containing the words that Baruch had written at Jeremiah’s dictation, the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah: 28 “Take another scroll and rewrite on it the very words that were on the original scroll, which Jehoiakim king of Judah has burned. 29 You are to proclaim concerning Jehoiakim king of Judah that this is what the LORD says: You have burned the scroll and said, ‘Why have you written on it that the king of Babylon would surely come and destroy this land and deprive it of man and beast?’ 30 Therefore this is what the LORD says about Jehoiakim king of Judah: He will have no one to sit on David’s throne, and his body will be thrown out and exposed to heat by day and frost by night. 31 I will punish him and his descendants and servants for their iniquity. I will bring on them, on the residents of Jerusalem, and on the men of Judah, all the calamity about which I warned them but they did not listen.” 32 Then Jeremiah took another scroll and gave it to the scribe Baruch son of Neriah, and at Jeremiah’s dictation he wrote on it all the words of the scroll that Jehoiakim king of Judah had burned in the fire. And many similar words were added to them.

What is the context?

After the burning, the Lord commands another scroll containing the former words. The king’s objection to Babylon’s coming destruction has not altered the announced judgment.

Jehoiakim, his household, officials, and the people will face the calamity they refused to hear. His royal future and the treatment of his body are addressed directly.

Baruch writes again at Jeremiah’s dictation, and further similar words are added. The second scroll continues the warning rather than merely replacing a damaged object.

The chapter’s movement from possible repentance to royal resistance makes the persistence of the word especially pointed.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley understands the denial of an heir on David’s throne as denying an enduring succession, noting Jeconiah’s brief reign. 2 Kings 24:6–17 records that succession and removal; the interpretation should keep that narrative alongside the oracle.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.

A Living Study And Exchange

This site is a living study effort. Thoughtful feedback is welcome, and future study may lead to clarification, correction, or revision.

Public comments, when enabled, will be reviewed before appearing on the site so discussion remains respectful and relevant. The goal is to grow in understanding, test everything by Scripture, and remain willing to change where the text requires it.