What is the context?
Pashhur son of Immer hears the prophecy, has Jeremiah beaten, and places him in stocks by the temple. Religious office is here used against the messenger’s announced word.
When released the next day, Jeremiah gives Pashhur a new name and announces terror for him and his associates. The king of Babylon is explicitly named as the coming captor.
The city’s wealth will be taken, and Pashhur and his household will go to Babylon. He will die there with the friends to whom he has prophesied lies.
The episode carries the warning into a specific conflict with an official. It does not give every preacher authority to rename critics or announce their individual deaths.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley connects Pashhur’s punishment with his false assurances and reads the new name through the terror that his future will bring. The scene shows an official’s responsibility for his speech and actions rather than treating his office as protection from accountability.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.