What is the context?
The sin of Judah is described as engraved on hearts and altars, with its worship remembered even by children. The image concerns established unfaithfulness, not something a public denial can rub away.
The warning about lost inheritance leads into a contrast of trusts. Depending on human strength while turning from the Lord is like a desert shrub; trusting Him is like a tree rooted near water.
The fruitful tree still faces heat and drought. The blessing is not a promise that no difficult season will ever come.
The question about the deceitful, incurable heart is answered by the Lord who searches it and judges deeds. A person’s inward confidence does not by itself establish truth or innocence.
The partridge image then compares unjust wealth with possession that cannot be secured permanently. The issue is the fortune’s unjust source and ultimate loss, not an independent lesson in bird biology.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley reads the heart’s deceit through false perceptions and self-assurances and stresses God’s knowledge where people cannot fully search themselves. His older partridge line concerns eggs not hatched, while the BSB pictures hatching eggs it did not lay. The two forms give different immediate images of insecure possession.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.