What is the context?
Tattenai’s report describes substantial construction being carried out diligently. It records the officials’ questions and gives the elders’ answer rather than simply repeating an accusation of rebellion.
The elders identify themselves as servants of the God of heaven and earth. They explain that the former temple was destroyed when their ancestors provoked God’s anger, and that Cyrus later authorized rebuilding and returned its articles through Sheshbazzar.
Their answer acknowledges both the reason for the earlier destruction and the permission under which they are working. Tattenai asks Darius to search the archives for Cyrus’s decree and send a decision.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Gill notes that the officials transmit the elders’ account fairly and fully. Wesley contrasts this with the misleading presentation of the earlier opposition. Henry emphasizes being ready to explain what one is doing in God’s service and why.
The account distinguishes an inquiry from a verdict against the builders. Tattenai asks the king to check the authorization, while the elders give an answer that can be checked against the royal records.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.