What is the context?
The remaining strip is for the city’s common use, including homes and pastureland. The city is square, with open space around it. Land on its east and west provides food for the workers who cultivate it.
Those workers come from all Israel’s tribes. The city serves a shared life among the people rather than belonging exclusively to one tribe.
The whole district, including the holy portions and city property, is twenty-five thousand cubits square. The prince’s land lies on either side, between Judah and Benjamin. Provision is made for worship, work, homes and leadership within the same ordered land.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley explains common use as land not consecrated to the sanctuary and the produce as maintenance for the city’s workers. Cambridge similarly distinguishes the city’s portion from the priests’ and Levites’ areas.
Common does not mean wicked. The vision includes ordinary work and a shared city alongside the areas set apart for sanctuary service.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.