What is the context?

The Lord names the sword of Babylon’s king as coming against Egypt. Ruthless warriors will ravage its pride and destroy its multitudes.

The cattle beside the waters will be removed, and neither human feet nor cattle hooves will muddy the rivers. The waters settle and flow like oil. The quiet follows the removal of the life and activity that had disturbed them.

The emptied land becomes the subject of a lament chanted by the daughters of the nations. The close repeats that the devastation will bring recognition of the Lord.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Cambridge explains the waters flowing like oil as smooth, clear waters no longer stirred up by people or animals. Henry and Wesley also draw a picture of heaviness and sadness over the nation.

These explanations stay with the comparison: the rivers are said to flow like oil. The verse does not say that the water becomes oil or blood.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?