What is the context?
In the seventh year, some elders come to consult the Lord through Ezekiel. He refuses their approach and tells the prophet to confront them with the abominations of their fathers.
The account begins in Egypt with God’s initiative. He chose Israel, made Himself known, swore to bring the people into a good land and commanded them to abandon Egypt’s idols.
Their response was rebellion. They refused to listen or put the idols away. The Lord speaks of His resolve to pour out wrath, then explains why He acted otherwise: His name must not be profaned before the nations who had seen Him make Himself known.
The history therefore begins with both unfaithfulness and mercy. The people’s refusal is real, but so is the Lord’s commitment to the name and promise by which He has revealed Himself.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Henry and Wesley understand the elders’ approach as inconsistent with their continued rebellion. The history exposes conduct that their present generation is still repeating.
Wesley emphasizes God’s mercy and faithfulness in acting for His name. The point is not that Israel had earned deliverance, but that God remained faithful to His purpose despite its refusal to abandon idols.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.