What is the context?
The next warning explains why Pharaoh is still standing. God could already have destroyed him and his people, but has preserved him to display His power and make His name known throughout the earth. The Hebrew verb behind raised you up comes from amad, to stand. Brown–Driver–Briggs explains its use here as maintaining someone rather than overthrowing him. The preceding verse places that preservation in view.
God announces unprecedented hail and also gives a warning that can save lives: bring servants and livestock under shelter. Some of Pharaoh’s officials fear the LORD’s word and act on it. Others leave them in the field. The account distinguishes these responses within Egypt itself.
The hail and lightning devastate what is exposed, while Goshen is spared. Pharaoh confesses that he has sinned, calls the LORD righteous and promises to release Israel. Moses agrees to pray, but tells him that he and his officials still do not fear the LORD.
The account also distinguishes the crops. Flax and barley are destroyed at their more advanced stage, while wheat and spelt remain because they are later crops. This explains why the next plague will still have something to consume.
When Moses prays, the storm ends. Pharaoh and his officials respond by hardening their hearts again. His confession has not led to keeping his promise. The closing refusal confirms what God had already said would happen.
How is this passage commonly understood?
The difference over God’s part in Pharaoh’s hardening continues through this account. Calvin understands God as actively directing the confrontation and connects Pharaoh’s preservation with a purpose determined before his birth. Wesley explains hardening as God giving Pharaoh over after his repeated resistance, permitting Satan to blind him. Both hold Pharaoh responsible for his refusal, while explaining God’s action differently.
They agree on the failure of Pharaoh’s confession to produce lasting obedience. Both point to his return to resistance after the storm ends. The words he says under pressure are tested by what he does when the pressure is removed.
Where does this fit in God's plan?
Romans 9:17–24 directly quotes God’s explanation to Pharaoh about displaying His power and making His name known. Paul places that event within his discussion of God’s mercy, patience and purposes, including His calling of people from both Jews and Gentiles. The Exodus becomes part of the New Testament’s explanation of God’s wider work.
Pharaoh’s response also illustrates a distinction made in 2 Corinthians 7:8–11: sorrow can lead to repentance, or it can remain sorrow over what has happened. Paul describes a sorrow that produces a changed response. Pharaoh’s story provides a contrasting example—the trouble stops, and his resistance returns. This is a parallel about the response to correction; Paul is addressing the Corinthians in their own circumstances.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.