What is the context?

The problem shifts from losing life to surrendering the results of labor. A successor will control what the Teacher worked to build, and he cannot ensure that successor’s wisdom.

The passage describes the distress of effort, grief, and a mind unable to rest. It challenges the expectation that skill and toil can secure complete ownership of the future.

The final lines then recognize eating, drinking, and enjoying work as coming from God’s hand. Receiving good in the present differs from demanding that work yield an indestructible estate.

The contrast between the person pleasing God and the sinner remains within the inquiry’s unsettling account of gain. It should not become a promise that every believer will acquire another person’s wealth.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley takes enjoyment as thankful acceptance of God’s comforts and a special gift rather than the automatic result of accumulation. His printed verse 25 asks who could pursue enjoyment more than the speaker; the BSB instead asks who can enjoy apart from God. Both should be reported according to their own wording.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?

No deeper study linked yet.