What is the context?
Moses commands the destruction of the named nations and their worship sites, forbids treaties, and forbids intermarriage that would turn Israel to other gods. These are severe conquest instructions, and the given concern about marriage is departure from the Lord.
Israel is called the Lord’s holy, prized possession, but its choice is not credited to superior numbers. The reason given is the Lord’s love and faithfulness to His oath to the fathers. That gift calls for obedience rather than pride or permission to imitate the worship being rejected.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley interprets the marriage restriction through its stated danger of idolatry and distinguishes it from marriage to someone who has turned to the Lord. He also stresses that God’s choice was not earned by Israel’s size or merit. The Westminster Confession 19.4 distinguishes Israel’s national judicial laws from laws directly binding other societies. The conquest instruction is not a warrant for private attacks or a general rule of racial segregation.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.