What is the context?

Moses calls Israel to fear, love, and serve the Lord with heart and soul, keeping His commands for their good. The One who owns heaven and earth has set His love on the fathers and their descendants.

The command to circumcise their hearts is explained by the accompanying demand to stop being stubborn. God’s impartiality then has practical consequences: He acts for orphans and widows and loves the foreigner with food and clothing. Israel must also love the foreigner, remembering its own life as foreigners in Egypt.

Fear, service, loyalty, and praise therefore belong with a changed heart and care for others. Being chosen does not excuse partiality or mistreatment of those without power.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley reads heart circumcision as the inward reality that the bodily sign should not replace. The USCCB notes explain the uncircumcised heart as closed and unreceptive to God. Both readings connect the figure with a responsive life rather than a physical operation on the heart.

Where does this fit in God's plan?

Romans 2:17–29 develops the same concern by distinguishing outward possession of the law and bodily circumcision from obedience and circumcision of the heart by the Spirit. This is a continuing biblical theme about inward faithfulness, not permission to despise Jewish people or assume any religious label guarantees a changed heart.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?