What is the context?

The explanation turns to kings of the South and North. One ruler’s commander becomes stronger than he is, establishing another powerful kingdom.

After some years, a daughter from the southern royal house is given in marriage to seal an agreement with the northern king. The arrangement collapses, and she and those connected with her are given up.

A member of her family then rises to power, attacks the northern kingdom and carries its valuables and gods to Egypt. Later the northern king invades the South and returns home. The marriage agreement has become another stage in a continuing struggle, rather than an enduring peace.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley connects the rival kingdoms with the Ptolemies and Seleucids. He identifies the daughter as Berenice and the later southern campaign with her brother avenging her fate. The USCCB notes also connect the failed marriage with Berenice and Antiochus II.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?