What is the context?

David grants Joab’s request, and Joab brings Absalom back from Geshur to Jerusalem. But the permission has a limit: Absalom may go to his house and must not see the king’s face. Return to the city has not yet become a personal reunion with his father.

The narrative then describes Absalom’s appearance and family. He is highly praised for his beauty, and his heavy hair is weighed when cut each year. Three sons and a daughter named Tamar are mentioned. Public admiration stands beside the unresolved relationship at the center of the story.

How is this passage commonly understood?

Wesley and Gill understand David’s restriction as a way of showing that Absalom’s crime has not been approved, and possibly of encouraging deeper humility. Those are explanations of his decision; the account does not report David giving a complete account of his motives.

Henry notes that the praise here concerns Absalom’s looks rather than wisdom or godliness. His attractive appearance gives readers no reason to assume that the problems revealed by his earlier actions have been resolved.

What is our position?

We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.

Where can I study this further?