What is the context?
While Elisha is in Damascus, the sick Ben-hadad sends Hazael to ask whether he will recover. Elisha tells Hazael to report recovery, yet says the Lord has shown him that the king will in fact die.
Elisha then weeps because he knows the violence Hazael will inflict on Israel, including against children and pregnant women. Hazael protests that he is too insignificant for such a thing, and Elisha tells him he will become king.
Hazael reports only the reassuring answer to Ben-hadad. The next day he puts a wet cloth over the king’s face, the king dies, and Hazael reigns. Foretelling his rise and atrocities is not a command approving the murder or the later cruelty.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley distinguishes an illness from which recovery was possible from death by another cause. That explains how he reads Elisha’s apparently conflicting words. The narrative’s own sequence is essential: Hazael conceals the full message and then causes the king’s death, while Elisha’s tears oppose any reading that welcomes the predicted atrocities.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.