What is the context?
The Lord announces judgment through the prophets because Manasseh has committed abominations and led Judah into sin. Jerusalem’s fate is compared with Samaria’s and Ahab’s house rather than exempted from the standard already applied there.
The image of wiping a bowl and turning it upside down describes a thorough emptying. The remaining inheritance will be delivered to enemies as plunder.
The explanation reaches beyond one king to the long history of provoking the Lord since Egypt. Judah’s surviving status has not made continuing covenant rejection harmless.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley reads the measuring line as the same judgment already imposed on Samaria. He also sees the unbroken bowl as leaving room for later restoration. That further inference should be distinguished from the immediate announced calamity: the picture must not be made to soften the devastation it describes.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.
Where can I study this further?
No deeper study linked yet.