What is the context?
The chapter names Solomon’s chief officials. Priestly service, writing, records, the army, supervision of governors, the palace and forced labor all have people assigned to them.
Some names continue from David’s reign, including Jehoshaphat and Benaiah. Others mark the developing organization under Solomon. Two men named Azariah appear, one identified as Zadok’s son and the other as Nathan’s son.
The list shows that the rule of one king depends on the work of many people. It also identifies the offices through which royal decisions are put into practice.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Henry sees wisdom in the appointment of officials and notes continuity with David’s administration. Different responsibilities require people to carry them out.
Abiathar’s name raises a question after his removal in chapter 2. Wesley understands the list as including successive holders of priestly office. Gill also considers the possibility that Abiathar retained the title after his removal. The verse names him without saying he has been restored to his former position.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.