What is the context?
Israel is divided between supporters of Tibni and Omri. Omri’s supporters prevail, Tibni dies, and Omri becomes king. His twelve-year reign includes six years in Tirzah.
Omri buys a hill from Shemer for two talents of silver and builds a city there, naming it Samaria after the former owner. He is eventually buried in that city, and his son Ahab succeeds him.
The account recognizes his building work and might but gives a severe assessment of his devotion: he does more evil than his predecessors and continues Jeroboam’s ways. Establishing a city does not establish faithfulness to God.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley and Gill count Omri’s reign from the earlier struggle for power, explaining the dates in terms of a contested period followed by sole rule.
Henry emphasizes that power and renown can coexist with serious wrongdoing. The account measures Omri by his response to God, alongside the strength and accomplishments mentioned in his royal record.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.