What is the context?
The LORD sends Jehu son of Hanani to Baasha. God raised Baasha to rule over Israel, but the king has continued Jeroboam’s course and led the people into sin. His house will now face the same destruction as Jeroboam’s.
The notice of Baasha’s death and Elah’s succession is followed by a further explanation of his guilt. It includes both the evil he has encouraged and his destruction of Jeroboam’s house.
The account does not let Baasha claim that his rise to power makes him exempt from judgment. He is responsible for his actions and for the worship he promotes.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Wesley and Gill distinguish God’s purpose in transferring rule from Baasha’s ambition and conduct. The fulfillment of a warning against Jeroboam does not make every action of the man who brings it about righteous.
Henry emphasizes the repeated pattern: Baasha resembles the family he destroyed in the very sins for which it was judged. His opportunity to govern becomes a responsibility he fails to meet.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.