What is the context?
The narrator refers to the royal records for Asa’s other accomplishments, his strength and the cities he built. Alongside those achievements comes a personal detail: in old age he becomes diseased in his feet.
Asa dies and is buried in the City of David. His son Jehoshaphat succeeds him. The brief notice closes a long reign without removing either its good work or its weaknesses.
How is this passage commonly understood?
Gill connects the illness with the fuller account in 2 Chronicles 16:12–14. Chronicles says that even then Asa did not seek the LORD, but relied only on physicians.
The concern is the absence of seeking God, continuing the issue raised by his alliance with Aram. The account does not identify the disease in medical terms or promise that a different response would necessarily have brought physical recovery.
What is our position?
We don't have a position on this passage yet. When our study reaches a conclusion the text supports, it will appear here.